Keiwert v. Meyer
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom the Dearborn Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.
Suit by the appellants against the appellee, to recover for goods sold and delivered.
The appellee (defendant below) answered in two paragraphs, substantially alike, that the goods sold and delivered were intoxicating liquors ; that they were sold in the town of Conno ver, in the State of Iowa; that there was, before and at the time of said sale, a law in Iowa prohibiting the sale of intoxicating liquors in said State, setting forth in his answer a copy of the law and negativing the fact that they were sold for medical, etc., purposes.
A copy of the law, as we have said, was made part of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Caulkins v. . HellmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Krulder v. . EllisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Cross v. . O'DonnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- People v. LillyMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Territt v. BartlettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1849
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cochran v. WardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
- Goodwine v. CadwalladerIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- Sprankle v. TruloveIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
- United States v. ClineDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1885
- Simmons Hardware Co. v. MullenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.