Legal Opinion
Binckley v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided June 1, 1936No. K-494PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Booth, Ohief Justice,
delivered the opinion of the court:
The letters-patent #1081199 involved in this case were granted on December 9, 1913, upon an application filed therefor July 12, 1909. The applicant was George Sydney Binckley, a citizen of the United States, and soon after filing his application he assigned to Tracy C. Becker and Raymond Ives Blakeslee each a one-third interest therein. These three plaintiffs jointly prosecute this suit, alleging that the United States, in the construction of the Coolidge Darn in Arizona, infringed their patent rights.
It is common knowledge that a dam…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Morgan Envelope Co. v. Albany Perforated Wrapping Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Toledo, P. C. & L. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
- Thacher v. Inhabitants of Town of FalmouthCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1917
- Thacher v. Inhabitants of FalmouthDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1916
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nicholas Straussler v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961