Legal Opinion

Russell v. Reed

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 17, 1884PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for McLeod, county, Macclonalcl, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.

This is an action to restrain the defendant’s foreclosure of a certain mortgage executed by plaintiff and her husband,, and for a cancellation thereof, on the ground of a fraudulent alteration, in a material part, subsequent to its execution. The mortgage, as recorded and disclosed by the foreclosure notice, purports to secure-the sum of $1,700 principal, according to the condition of six notes, payable at different dates, in which the interest is computed and included to the maturity thereof, which interest it appeared on the trial was 11 per cent. The complaint charges that the mortgage was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Knox v. BigelowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hatcher v. Union Trust Co. of MarylandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  2. Coughlin v. Farmers & Mechanics Savings BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. Johnson v. HolmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  4. Messerall v. DreyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API