Messerall v. Dreyer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHajjLAM, J.
The trial court found that plaintiffs, father and son, were partners engaged in the cutting and skidding of logs and that as such partners they “performed certain work, labor, and services for said defendant Dreyer by themselves and team and at the special instance and request of * * * Dreyer,” and at an agreed price, in cutting and skidding certain logs and in skidding certain logs cut by others. A jury was impaneled. No issues had been framed for submission to the jury. The court on its own motion submitted “the issue of what was due plaintiffs for the work they did.” The jury found the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hulett v. CareySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Schmidt v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Martin v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Roussain v. PattenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Breault v. ArchambaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Westberg v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Central State Bank v. Royal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926