Legal Opinion

Doub v. Doub

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1984No. 8321DC741PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

I

Defendant’s first assignment of error is to the trial court’s refusal to allow defendant to put on his evidence of changed circumstances. Defendant contends that this action is in effect one to enforce a court order for the payment of alimony and is, therefore, modifiable by the court. We do not agree.

Plaintiff wife’s action in this case was clearly an action in contract to enforce the terms of the 1978 separation agreement. Because the 1978 separation agreement was incorporated by reference into the 1978 court order granting defendant an absolute divorce, defendant contends…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Henry v. DeenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Walters v. WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Rowe v. RoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Edwards v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Doub v. DoubSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Cecil v. CecilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Fucito v. FrancisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. Frykberg v. FrykbergCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Marks v. MarksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API