Legal Opinion

United States v. Michel-Diaz

District Court, D. Montana

Decided June 13, 2002No. CV 02-02-H-DWMPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MOLLOY, Chief Judge.

The United States moves the Court to modify the Scheduling Order in this matter to strike the expert witness disclosure requirements set out by the Court. The government argues that the express requirements of the Court’s Order exceed the scope of Fed.R.Crim.P. 16(a)(1)(E), and therefore the government should not be required to comply with the expert witness disclosure requirements delineated in the Scheduling Order.

Paragraph Four of the Scheduling Order in this matter reads, in its entirety:

The parties are under a continuing duty of disclosure and discovery of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Blackburn JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  2. United States v. JacksonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974
  3. United States v. GerenaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. GraceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API