Legal Opinion

Neale v. Morrow

California Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1907No. S.F. No. 4008PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

This is an appeal, from a- judgment entered in favor of defendant after an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint was entered.

The action is founded on a promissory note made by A. E. Head, against whom the action was originally commenced, but who having thereafter died, the respondent, as his administrator, was substituted as defendant.

It appears from the allegations of the complaint, necessary to be stated in order to discuss the point involved on this ap peal, that said note was executed by said A. E. Head on January 6, 1868, and is as follows:—

“Office of the California Mutual Life…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Neale v. HeadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Neale v. MorrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Bass v. HueterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Hurwitz v. GrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  4. Neale v. MorrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Woollomes v. GomesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API