Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Vartan
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 15, 1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Judge.
John 0. Vartan, trading as Independent American Investments (Vartan), has filed Preliminary Objections to the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts’ (AOPC) Amended Petition for Review of a Governmental Determination in the Nature of a Petition for a Writ of Prohibition and/or Mandamus (Amended Petition for Review).
AOPC and Vartan entered into a written lease agreement (Contract) on October 10, 1989 for a parcel of land on which Vartan was to build a courthouse which would be occupied by the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. The Contract was contingent upon AOPC’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Carpentertown Coal & Coke Co. v. LairdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Municial Publications, Inc. v. Court of Common PleasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Garratt v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Commonwealth v. CaplanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Pennsylvania Department of Aging v. LindbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Saunders v. Commonwealth, Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Lichtman, J. v. Feder, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- M. Rivera v. J.L. HaddockCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- T.A. Wilkins v. M.R. ClarkCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Weaver v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997