State v. Schmitz
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
TERNUS, Justice.
After the defendant, Lynn Schmitz, was convicted of one count of theft in the second degree, the district court dismissed the second and third theft charges filed against Schmitz, ruling that prosecution on these charges would violate the Double Jeopardy Clause. See U.S. Const, amend. V. The court concluded that the three charges, all based on the defendant’s exercise of control over stolen property, constituted the same offense. See Iowa Code §§ 714.1(4), .2(2) (1995). Under the facts of this case, we disagree. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for trial on the remaining…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- In Re SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- State v. BirkestrandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
- State v. PerezSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Valentin VelezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- State v. BurgessSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- State v. McCoySupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- State of Iowa v. Christopher Raymond LindellSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- State of Iowa v. Abdirizak Mursal ArabCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2022
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.