Legal Opinion

State v. Cadmus

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 12, 1983No. 1970; A25732PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Defendant was charged with driving under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 487.540. He appeals from a trial court order denying his motion to suppress evidence of statements he made to a police officer. The state concedes that this case is factually similar to State v. Taylor, 59 Or App 396, 650 P2d 1090 (1982), which we find controlling. We conclude that it was reversible error to deny defendant’s motion to suppress his statements to the police officer.

Defendant also assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence of his refusal to submit to a breath test. He…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. State v. NewtonOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API