Egland v. Neill
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Whether through service of the owner and occupant of the surface of land as a garnishee, the trial court acquired jurisdiction of mineral rights therein owned by the nonresident defendant, upon whom substituted service was had, is the narrow question the parties would have us answer.
Plaintiff’s action is for a judgment for money alleged to be due from defendant under a contract. In connection therewith he instituted proceedings in garnishment wherein several persons were namd and served as garnishees. The respective disclosures of these garnishees state that they hold title and possession of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Humphreys-Mexia Co. v. GammonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Dabney-Johnston Oil Corp. v. WaldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Woodbine Savings Bank v. YagerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. HydeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Matter of Discipline of TidballSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Lillehaug v. City of Sioux FallsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Farmers Union Coop Ass'n v. Schladweiler Bros., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Nite Owl Corporation v. Management Services, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
- Egland v. NeillSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.