Legal Opinion

Diekmann v. Associates Discount Corporation

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 1966No. 32122, 32199PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLEMENS, Commissioner.

The plaintiffs, Kurt J. Diekmann and his wife Norma Diekmann, appeal from an order vacating a default judgment they had gotten against defendant-respondent Bernard H. Lindenbusch, a car dealer. The parties brief two issues: Is the order ap-pealable ? If so, was it proper for the trial court, after the judgment had become final, to set it aside on the ground it had been rendered on an amended petition not served on defendant Lindenbusch?

The plaintiffs had sued three defendants for damages suffered from buying, financing and insuring an automobile. Each was served with…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Casper v. LeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  2. Cross v. GouldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Wooten v. FriedbergSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  4. Bussiere's Admisnistrator v. SaymanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  5. Crossland v. AdmireSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Sprung v. Negwer Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  2. Ribbons v. Union Electric Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  3. Rook v. John F. Oliver Trucking CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. In Re the Marriage of BradfordMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Godsy v. GodsyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API