Legal Opinion

Rau v. Christy

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 15, 1964No. 4262PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, Justice.

Judgment in this non-jury trespass to try title case was rendered for appellee as plaintiff and cross-defendant.

Appellant Rau was the record owner of an undivided one-half interest in the land in question, the other one-half interest being owned by his kinsmen, the Junemanns. Appellee Christy became a tenant of the land under lease from the Junemanns for the two-year period, 1946 to 1948, according to the unchallenged finding of the trial court. There is nothing in the record to show he was not thereby a tenant also of Rau, who was a tenant in common. In 1948 one of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Todd v. BrunerTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Phillipson v. FlynnTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Moore v. KnightTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Republic Production Co. v. LeeTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Alexander v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1857

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dyer v. Cotton, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
  2. BP America Production Co. v. Marshall, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009
  3. Spiller v. Woodard, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
  4. Radford v. GarzaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Keels v. KeelsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API