Legal Opinion

Spiller v. Woodard

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided May 2, 1991No. 01-89-001169-CVPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’CONNOR, Justice.

This Court is called upon to determine if the defendants’ possession of the property was sufficiently adverse to put the plaintiffs, their cotenants, on notice. We hold it was not. We reverse the judgment for the defendants, we render judgment for the plaintiffs, and we remand for partition by the trial court.

Statement of facts

The plaintiffs 1 and the defendants 2 represent two branches of a family descending from the patriarch Nat Fanuiel, from whom they inherited land in Brazoria County, the property in dispute. Fanuiel acquired the property in 1871, and in 1917,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mercer v. Bludworth, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
  2. Todd v. BrunerTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Tex-Wis Company v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  4. IFG Leasing Co. v. Ellis, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  5. Pontiac v. Elliott, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Southwestern Bell Media, Inc. v. Lyles, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
  2. Glover v. Union Pacific Railroad, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
  3. Amador v. Berrospe, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997
  4. Dyer v. Cotton, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
  5. Thedford v. Union Oil Co. of California, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API