Legal Opinion

Roe v. Snattinger

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 7, 1914No. 18,645PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Shawnee district court, division No. 2; George H. Whitcomb, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

The appellee recovered judgment against the appellants for $100 and costs. The appellants brought an appeal to this court, and appellee presents this motion to dismiss the appeal. The question turns upon the amount in controversy. The statute was interpreted in Blank v. Powell, 68 Kan. 556, 75 Pac. 486, *568and in Richmond v. Brummie, 52 Kan. 247, 34 Pac. 783. In the latter case it was said:

“Where the damages claimed in a civil action by the plaintiff exceed $100, but the judgment is for the plaintiff for $100 only, exclusive of costs, and the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Richmond v. BrummieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  2. Clyde Milling & Elevator Co. v. BuoySupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  3. Blank v. PowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  4. Samp v. BradenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lower v. ShorthillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  2. Priest v. Kansas City Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  3. Grindley v. WoodsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  4. Kansas v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Kansas v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API