Legal Opinion

Richmond v. Brummie

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1893PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from Sedgwick Common Pleas Court. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

HortON, C. J.:

Otto Brummie, as administrator of the estate of Margaret Brummie, deceased, brought his action against Dr. S. W. Richmond to recover $10,000 damages, alleged to have accrued by reason of the unskillful treatment,, as a physician, of Margaret Brummie, his wife. The jury returned, a verdict for plaintiff below for $100. Judgment was entered for $100, with costs. Richmond, defendant below, brings the case to this court for review. Otto Brummie contends that the case should be dismissed, upon the ground that this court has not jurisdiction.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex parte SweeneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Walker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  3. Railroad Co. v. TrookSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. John Smith T. v. HoneySupreme Court of the United States · 1830

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Green v. National Annuity Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  2. Roe v. SnattingerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. Wayman v. SollerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  4. McClelland v. CragunSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  5. Deming Inv. Co. v. BlakemoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API