Legal Opinion

Priest v. Kansas City Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 8, 1924No. 24,358PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

The judgment in favor of the plaintiff having been reversed, and a new trial ordered, she has filed a motion for a rehearing, and the defendant a motion for a modification of this court’s order so as to direct a judgment in its favor. The motions are overruled, but some of the matters referred to therein will be briefly discussed.

*2Nothing in the opinion was intended to indicate that an answer of the jury “We don’t think so” was not to be treated as a negative, although it may in connection with other answers of “We don’t know” suggest a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Morrow v. County Commissioners of Saline CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
  2. Johnson v. Royal Neighbors of AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Kalina v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  4. Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. PeaveySupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  5. Webster v. Columbian National Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cain v. SteelySupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  2. Priest v. Kansas City Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  3. Doty v. Crystal Ice & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  4. New York Life Insurance v. CobbMissouri Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. Pioneer Trust Co. v. CombsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API