Priest v. Kansas City Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mason, J.:
The judgment in favor of the plaintiff having been reversed, and a new trial ordered, she has filed a motion for a rehearing, and the defendant a motion for a modification of this court’s order so as to direct a judgment in its favor. The motions are overruled, but some of the matters referred to therein will be briefly discussed.
*2Nothing in the opinion was intended to indicate that an answer of the jury “We don’t think so” was not to be treated as a negative, although it may in connection with other answers of “We don’t know” suggest a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morrow v. County Commissioners of Saline CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
- Johnson v. Royal Neighbors of AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
- Kalina v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. PeaveySupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- Webster v. Columbian National Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cain v. SteelySupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
- Priest v. Kansas City Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- Doty v. Crystal Ice & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1927
- New York Life Insurance v. CobbMissouri Court of Appeals · 1926
- Pioneer Trust Co. v. CombsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.