Osage Tribe of Indians v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HEWITT, Judge.
Plaintiff, the Osage Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma (Osage or Tribe) seeks to recover damages from defendant for its alleged failure to collect and invest revenues generated from the Osage mineral estate.1 See Plaintiffs Statement of Trust Fund Mismanagement Claims for Tranche One (Pl.’s T1 Claims) at 5. Before the court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, in Part, Plaintiffs Tranche One Claims (Def.’s Mot.), arguing that plaintiffs claims fall, at least in part, outside the jurisdictional parameters described in Shoshone Indian Tribe of the Wind River Reservation…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Osage Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Oenga v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Osage Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Osage Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Osage Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.