Legal Opinion

Aull v. Secretary of Health of Human Services

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided August 28, 2006No. 2005-5139PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHALL, Circuit Judge.

Daniel L. and Frances C. Aull, as co-administrators of their deceased son’s estate, 1 appeal the final decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims that sustained the decision of the special master dismissing their petition for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-l to -34 (‘Vaccine Act” or “Act”) for lack of jurisdiction. Aull v. Sec’y of Health & Human Sews., 65 Fed.Cl. 400 (2005) (“Aull II ”). The special master ruled that the pendency in state court of a claim against the administering physician for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ryan Martin, by His Parents and Next Friends, Kim and Samuel Martin v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  2. Barbara Amendola and Warren Amendola, as Parents and Guardians of Christopher Amendola v. Secretary, Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  3. Aull v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Graves ex rel. Estate of Graves v. Secretary of the Dept. of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  2. Heinzelman v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  3. Crucen v. LearyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Kay v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  5. Stenberg v. KalanskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API