Legal Opinion
Heinzelman v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 13, 2012No. 20-2291PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge.
This case involves a dispute over the amount of compensation Petitioner Stacey Heinzelman (“Heinzelman”) is entitled to receive under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to 300aa-34 (“Vaccine Act”). The Secretary of Health and Human Services (“the government”) appeals the final decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims, which affirmed the special master’s decision that Petitioner’s compensation under the Vaccine Act should not be reduced by the amount of benefits she is eligible to receive through Social Security…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Graves ex rel. Estate of Graves v. Secretary of the Dept. of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Frankel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Khadijah El-Amin v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2013
- Stephen Yonek v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Community Health Choice, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.