Jack Wood Construction Co. v. United States Department of Transportation
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
Jack Wood Construction Company, Inc. brings this action under the Administrative Procedure Act to challenge the determination of the Department of Transportation affirming the decision of the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department (“AHTD”) to deny certification to Jack Wood as a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (“DBE”). Plaintiff claims that the DOT’s determination that Jack Wood no longer meets the criteria to continue to participate in the DBE program is arbitrary and capricious, an abuse of discretion or otherwise not in accordance…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- American Horse Protection Association, Inc. v. Richard E. Lyng, Secretary, U.S. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Checkosky v. SecCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- National Treasury Employees Union v. HornerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- BP Exploration & Oil, Inc. v. U.S. Department of TransportationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- Harrisburg Hospital v. ShalalaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- (PC) Kirchner v. BiterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- P.C.M., Inc. v. Minority Business Enterprise Commission, 98-963 (1999)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 1999