Legal Opinion

BP Exploration & Oil, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Transportation

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 26, 1999No. Civ.A. 97-1206(PLF)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. BP Exploration & Oil, Inc. (“BP”) challenges the Coast Guard’s assessment of a $5,000 penalty against it under the Clean Water Act for the discharge' of a harmful quantity of oil into Curtis Bay in Baltimore, Maryland. Because the. Court concludes that the Coast Guard’s determination that BP is liable for the discharge is supported by substantial evidence in the administrative record and was not an abuse of discretion, it- upholds >the Coast Guard’s decision.

I. BACKGROUND

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Arkansas v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Keystone Shipping Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
  2. Colbro Ship Mgmt. Co., Ltd. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2000
  3. United States v. ATP Oil & Gas Corp.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2013
  4. Velez-Amador v. SchultzDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API