Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. SRO Corp. CA2/5

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 30, 2020No. B301799Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 9/30/20 Hamilton v. SRO Corp. CA2/5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE EUGENE HAMILTON, B301799 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 19STCV04839) v. SRO CORPORATION et…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. Schifando v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Cantu v. Resolution Trust Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Rakestraw v. California Physicians' ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Vasilenko v. Grace Family ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API