Legal Opinion
Ottaway v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided June 30, 2005No. 1 CA-CV 04-0815PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EHRLICH, Judge.
¶ 1 The Office of the Phoenix City Prosecutor charged Richard Ottaway with interfering with a judicial proceeding. See Ariz.Rev. Stat. (“A.R.S.”) § 13-2810(A)(2) (2003). Ott-away asked that this charge be tried to a jury, a motion denied by the municipal court and special-action relief denied by the superi- or court. For reasons that follow, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 According to its complaint, the Phoenix City Prosecutor charges that Ottaway “knowingly disobeyed or resisted the lawful order, process or mandate of [the Phoenix Municipal Court]” in violation of A.R.S. §…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schriro v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blanton v. City of North Las VegasSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. DonaldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- West Valley View, Inc. v. Maricopa County Sheriff's OfficeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Crowell v. JejnaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Abuhl v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Hormel v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- SULAVKA v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.