Legal Opinion

Crowell v. Jejna

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 21, 2007No. 1 CA-CV 06-0430PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHNSEN, Judge.

¶ 1 Appellant Erin Crowell dances in what the Scottsdale City Code calls an “adult service business.” Crowell is alleged to have violated three ordinances that forbid “adult service providers” from performing without a permit, forbid “adult service providers” from performing less than three feet from a “patron” and forbid a “patron” from placing “any money on the person or in or on the costume” of a performer. Crowell argues the Arizona Constitution guarantees her a jury trial on these offenses and appeals from the superior court’s denial of her special action. For the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Irwin v. GavitSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Blanton v. City of North Las VegasSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Derendal v. GriffithArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Yauch v. State, City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. BUCCELLATO v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. SULAVKA v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  3. State v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  4. State v. Hon kalauli/krollCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  5. Bosworth v. Hon. anagnost/azCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API