Legal Opinion

Quittner v. Motion Picture Producers & Distributors of America, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 17, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COXE, District Judge.

This is an application by the defendants to strike out paragraphs fifteenth, sixteenth, seventeenth to twenty-third, inclusive, and thirty-eighth, of the complaint, on the ground the allegations are repetitious and irrevelant. The motion is made under rule 103 of the New York Rules of Civil. Practice; and it is not resisted by the plaintiffs in so far as directed against paragraphs fifteenth and thirty-eighth. It is insisted, however, by the plaintiffs, that paragraphs sixteenth to twenty-third, inclusive, relating to the uniform exhibition contract and the litigation…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Paramount Famous Lasky Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. United States v. First National Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Locker v. American Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
  5. Hart v. B. F. Keith Vaudeville ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Westor Theatres, Inc. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1941
  2. Package Closure Corp. v. Sealright Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API