Quittner v. Motion Picture Producers & Distributors of America, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
COXE, District Judge.
This is an application by the defendants to strike out paragraphs fifteenth, sixteenth, seventeenth to twenty-third, inclusive, and thirty-eighth, of the complaint, on the ground the allegations are repetitious and irrevelant. The motion is made under rule 103 of the New York Rules of Civil. Practice; and it is not resisted by the plaintiffs in so far as directed against paragraphs fifteenth and thirty-eighth. It is insisted, however, by the plaintiffs, that paragraphs sixteenth to twenty-third, inclusive, relating to the uniform exhibition contract and the litigation…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Paramount Famous Lasky Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- United States v. First National Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Locker v. American Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- Hart v. B. F. Keith Vaudeville ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Westor Theatres, Inc. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1941
- Package Closure Corp. v. Sealright Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1943