Hart v. B. F. Keith Vaudeville Exchange
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
By stipulation, the parties agreed to try these causes as one and to enter a judgment and decree accordingly. They were tried before the District Judge, a jury having been waived in the law action. The decision in each case depends principally upon the determination of whether the parties were engaged in interstate commerce in their respective business. They may be and will be considered in one opinion, and we shall refer to the parties as plaintiff and defendants as below.
Considering the facts most favorable to the plaintiff, the plaintiff’s business is said, to be that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Hooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Stafford v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Binderup v. Pathe Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Flood v. KuhnSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ring v. SpinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- United States v. ShubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- American Federation of Musicians v. SteinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
- Conley v. San Carlo Opera Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.