Legal Opinion
Package Closure Corp. v. Sealright Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 19, 1943PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAFFEY, District Judge.
This is an action, under section 7 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 15, seeking recovery of treble damages. Five defendants (three corporate and two individual) have moved, pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, to dismiss the amended complaint. All assigned as a ground, pursuant to clause (6), failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. Two add as a ground, pursuant to clause (1), failure *116to show that this court has jurisdiction over the subject matter.
Several weeks earlier Judge Bondy had before him…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Pacific States Box & Basket Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schy v. Susquehanna Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- Roberts v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Sunbeam Corp. v. Payless Drug StoresDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1953
- Anderson v. OakleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Schy v. Susquehanna CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.