Legal Opinion

James Mack Co. v. Bear River Milling Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1924No. 4108PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThubman, J.

It is alleged in tbe complaint that on September 1, 1920, plaintiff sold and delivered to defendant 592.10 bushels of wheat at 2.10 per bushel, amounting to $1,243.40, and that the same became due on said date; that no part of said amount had been paid, although demand had been made therefor. Judgment is prayed for said amount, with interest.

Defendant denies the allegation as to the sale and delivery, but admits the nonpayment. Further answering as an affirmative defense, it alleges that in July, 1920, one Le Grande Hunsaker delivered to defendant a large quantity of wheat to be stored with…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brown v. WadeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  2. Smith v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
  3. Calkins v. LockwoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1845
  4. Couillard v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Dean v. TallmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. West River Equipment Co. v. Holzworth Construction Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Essex Chair Co. v. Fine Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1950
  3. Brown v. BeckArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Collett v. HiltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API