Legal Opinion

Gillette v. Pepper Tank Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided October 18, 1984No. 80CA0232PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PIERCE, Judge.

From a judgment entered after trial to the court in an action for determination of the validity of an oil and gas lease held by defendants, both defendants and plaintiffs appeal. We previously remanded for further findings, and now consider the appeal upon resubmission.

The lease provides for a 4-month primary term and as long thereafter as oil or gas is produced. The principal saving clause, relied on by the trial court, provides:

“It is agreed that this lease shall never be forfeited or cancelled for failure to perform in whole or in part any of its implied covenants,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Page v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  2. Brewster v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  3. Sauder v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Phillips Petroleum Company v. Heber A. Peterson and Astrid N. D. Peterson, Phillips Petroleum Company v. John H. Haslem and Rebecca H. HaslemCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  5. A. F. Buchanan and Wife, Celeste Buchanan v. Sinclair Oil & Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Garman v. Conoco, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. MarsColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Oil v. RiemerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Sorenson v. FeltonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Davis v. CramerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API