Minter v. Fowler & Williams, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD, District Judge.
The defendant, Nicholas Marotta, has moved to dismiss the plaintiff’s action against him on the ground that venue is improper in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The motion involves statutory construction of the venue provisions of the Judicial Code (28 U.S.C. A. §§ 1391 and 1392). The pertinent provisions thereof read as follows:
“§ 1391. Venue generally
“(a) A civil action wherein jurisdiction is founded only on diversity of citizenship may, except as otherwise provided by law, be brought only in the judicial district where all plaintiffs or all defendants reside.”
*…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Suttle v. Reich Bros. Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Jacobson v. Indianapolis Power & Light CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1958
- Johnstone v. York County Gas CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- Hawks v. Maryland & Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
3Cited by15 opinions
- Jerry Wayne Davis v. Hill Engineering, Inc. And Williams-Mcwilliams Co., Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Burbank International, Ltd. v. Gulf Consolidated International Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1977
- De George v. Mandata Poultry CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- Hawkins v. National Basketball AssociationDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- Baksay v. Rensellear Polytech InstituteDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.