Legal Opinion

Douglass v. Levi Strauss & Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 20, 1993No. 93-530PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

The issue in this case is whether the appellee, Levi Strauss & Company (Levi) may recover from the Arkansas Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund (Fund) money owed to Levi by a defunct insurance company. The appellant, Lee Douglass, Arkansas Insurance Commissioner, argues Levi may not recover from the Fund because the Act creating the Fund limits recovery against it to claims by Arkansas residents and Levi, a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in California, does not qualify. Thus refined, the issue becomes whether a foreign corporation…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Davis v. HoltSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Zinke-Smith, Inc. v. FLA. INSURANCE GUAR. ASS'N, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  3. Iowa Contractors Workers' Compensation Group v. Iowa Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  4. Krone v. CooperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
  5. Kroblin Refrigerated Xpress, Inc. v. Iowa Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. American Employers' Insurance v. Elf Atochem North America, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  2. Harold Ives Trucking Co. v. PickensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Conex Freight Systems, Inc. v. Georgia Insurance Insolvency PoolCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  4. Orren v. Smackover Nursing Home & Arkansas Guaranty FundCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API