Legal Opinion

Harold Ives Trucking Co. v. Pickens

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 18, 2003No. 03-361PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

This appeal requires us, for the first time, to interpret the meaning of the word “affiliate” in Ark. Code Ann. § 23-90-101 et seq. (Repl. 1999), known as the Arkansas Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty Act (hereafter also referred to as the Guaranty Act or Guaranty Fund). We granted appellant Harold Ives Trucking Company, Inc.’s motion to certify the appeal to this court in order to address this question of first impression. See Ark. Sup. Ct. R. l-2(b)(l).

Harold Ives Trucking Company (“Harold Ives”) is an Arkansas-based corporation. In November of 1999, Harold Ives…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ford v. KeithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Keith v. Barrow-Hicks Extensions of Water Improvement District No. 85Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  3. Neeve v. City of Caddo ValleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Nationsbank, N.A. v. Murray Guard, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Douglass v. Levi Strauss & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Benson v. New Hampshire Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  2. Delaware Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Christiana Care Health Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  3. Hopkins v. HowardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Flintkote Co. v. General Accident Assurance Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2006
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API