Legal Opinion

Info-Hold, Inc. v. Muzak LLC

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided April 24, 2015No. 2014-1167PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNA, Circuit Judge.

This case comes before us on appeal of numerous rulings unfavorable to Info-Hold, Inc. (“Info-Hold”), owner of U.S. Patent No. 5,991,374 (the “'374 patent”), the sole patent in the dispute. Info-Hold 'asserted the '374 patent against Muzak LLC (“Muzak”) and Applied Media Technologies Corporation (“AMTC”) in sepa rate lawsuits before the same judge in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. Those suits led to separate appeals, which were argued on the same day before the same panel. We address the issues raised in Info-Hold’s appeal in the AMTC…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Thorner v. Sony Computer Entertainment America LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  4. Teva Pharm. United States, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. Clarence Seay, Jr. v. Tennessee Valley Authority Craven CrowellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Carnegie Mellon University v. Marvell Technology Group, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  2. Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  3. Multilayer Stretch Cling Film Holdings, Inc. v. Berry Plastics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  4. Carson Optical Inc. v. eBay Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
  5. Astornet Technologies Inc. v. Bae Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API