Kaufman v. McCrory Stores Division of McCrory Corp.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CALDWELL, District Judge.
I. Introduction.
Plaintiff, William Kaufman, has filed a pro se complaint, alleging that defendants violated his civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants, Geiger & Loria Reporting Service (Geiger & Loria) and Helena Bowes, have moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim. Defendants, McCrory Stores Division of McCrory Corp. (McCrory Corp.) and Rapid American Corp., after filing an answer, have moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c).
The main issue presented is whether a privately employed stenographer who is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Aileen Henig, a Minor Together With Ludwig Henig and Geneva M. Henig, Her Parents v. Rocco A. OdoriosoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Augenti v. CappelliniDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Daniel v. SafirDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- Leftwich v. BevilacquaDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1986
- Humphrey v. Court of Common Pleas of York CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
- Kaufman, Appeal OfCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986