Augenti v. Cappellini
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CONABOY, District Judge.
This action is before the Court on Defendant Cappellini’s Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to F.R.C.Proc. 56. Defendant maintains that he is entitled to summary judgment, (1) on Plaintiff’s claim brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 because jurisdiction under this statutory provision is based solely on the involvement of John Richard Benson, and Defendant contends that this is not sufficient to meet state action requirement of § 1983; (2) on Plaintiff’s § 1985 claim because the Plaintiffs have failed to show that the Defendants Augenti or their…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Basista v. WeirCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re International Systems And Controls Corporation Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Laxalt v. McClatchyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1987
- Cooper v. MolkoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1981
- Mason C. Day Excavating, Inc. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1992
- Lehnert v. Ferris Faculty Association-MEA-NEADistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.