Legal Opinion

LaFarr v. Scribner

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 24, 1988No. 86-499PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment of the Franklin Superior Court barring their utilization of claimed affirmative defenses in a suit for recovery on a note due to plaintiff. We reverse.

I

In 1980, defendants gave plaintiff a second mortgage and a note secured by land and premises in defendants’ possession. Thereafter, plaintiff brought a foreclosure proceeding, and in 1983, the Franklin Superior Court issued a judgment and decree of foreclosure on the mortgage. A deficiency judgment on the mortgage was neither requested by plaintiff nor granted by the court. Defendants failed to redeem the land…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Central Penn Nat'l Bank v. Stonebridge Ltd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  2. Wursthaus, Inc. v. CerretaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  3. United Savings Bank v. BarberSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
  4. Manly v. SlasonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1856
  5. Yager v. Rubymar Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kepler v. SladeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Vermont National Bank v. ClarkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  3. Pomfret Farms Ltd. Partnership v. Pomfret AssociatesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  4. Ward v. WardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  5. United States v. $2,542 in U.S. CurrencyDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API