Legal Opinion
Hood v. F. Hoffman-La Roche, Ltd.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 4, 2009No. Civil Action 06-01484 (TFH)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
THOMAS F. HOGAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is a Motion to Remand filed by Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood, who seeks to have this lawsuit remanded back to the Chancery Court of Rankin County, Mississippi, where it originally was filed. The Mississippi Attorney General’s motion is opposed by three of the ten named defendants in this lawsuit — F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd., Hoffman-La Roche Inc., and Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — which jointly assert that they are the only defendants the Mississippi Attorney General properly served with a copy of the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Carden v. Arkoma AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- National Consumers League v. Flowers Bakeries, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- National Consumers League v. Bimbo Bakeries USADistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- WEST VIRGINIA EX REL. McGRAW v. Comcast Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Witte v. General Nutrition CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Breathe Dc v. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.