Legal Opinion

Willingham v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 22, 1956No. 12946PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMBLEN, Chief Justice.

This suit was instituted by appellants against appellee. The 'Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, to recover for the loss from collision of an automobile under a policy of insurance issued by appellee covering automobiles held for sale by appellants in their business as automobile dealers. Appellee answered by alleging that the automobile in question was not being held for sale by appellants and was not owned by appellants at the time of the loss complained of. Trial was before a jury in the District Court of Harris County. At the conclusion of the evidence, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Texas Farm Bureau Cotton Ass'n v. StovallTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Brown v. Palatine Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Equitable Life Insurance v. HazlewoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  4. Goddard v. East Texas Fire InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Bills v. Hibernia Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hale v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  2. Calvert v. Zanes-Ewalt Warehouse, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. Meyer v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. Miami Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  5. Hale v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API