Legal Opinion

United States v. Barry Kendall Hogan, and Mark Bradford Hogan

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 29, 1985No. 84-1687PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Chief Judge:

I

Barry Kendall Hogan and Mark Bradford (Brad) Hogan appeal their conviction of importing marijuana and conspiracy to import and possess with the intent to distribute the drug. Because the government called a witness for the primary purpose of impeaching him with otherwise inadmissible hearsay evidence, we reverse.

II

At a jury trial, the government asserted that the Hogan brothers were implicated in an operation that smuggled marijuana from Mexico into Texas. The fulcrum of the government’s proof was the testimony of Mark Carpenter, the pilot of Barry Hogan’s airplane,…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Goldberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Campbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. United States v. Jo Ann Harrelson, Charles Voyed Harrelson and Elizabeth Nichols ChagraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. Ronald Berkowitz, Paul D'alessandro, Kevin Van Coughnett, Bisan Vafaie, and Wendall HowellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. United States v. Cisneros-GutierrezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. Barley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  4. United States v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. Hughes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API