Campbell v. United States

This case, involving questions under the so-called Jencks Act, 18 U. S. C. § 3500,1 is before the Court for the second time. When it was first here, we held inadequate *489the procedure employed by the trial court for ascertaining whether notes takén by Federal Agent John F. Toomey, Jr., at his interview with Dominic Staula — a key government witness at petitioners’ trial for bank robbery — or the Interview Report compiled by Toomey from his notes, were producible statements within the meaning of §3500 (e)(1) or (e)(2). 365 U. S. 85.2 We declined to order petitioners’ convictions vacated, but…