Whitson Food Products Co. v. McClung
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, Justice.
Appellant makes the following statement of the nature and results of the case which appellee concedes to be substantially correct. “Appellee brought this suit in the County Court of Taylor County, Texas, for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by eating tamales canned by appellant, which contained a piece of glass or some substance similar to glass, which became embedded in her gums under her false teeth. Appellee purchased the can of tamales from a retail merchant in Abilene, and both by proof and stipulation,, the can of tamales was manufactured and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Compton v. ElliottTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Hill v. KimballTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Ricker, Lee & Co. v. ShoemakerTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Meredith v. McClendonTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- Meredith v. McClendonTexas Supreme Court · 1938
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McElyea v. BowlesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
- Hargrove v. KoepkeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- Jackson v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Hendrix v. EverettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- Capps v. DoddCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952