Daniel Oriakhi v. GEO Group, Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: *
Daniel Oriakhi appeals the district court’s dismissal of his prisoner civil rights suit under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915 and 1915A as frivolous and for failure to state a claim. Our review is de novo. 1 Oriakhi raises two issues on appeal, both of which concern the dismissal of defendant GEO Group and its employees.
Oriakhi’s complaint was correctly interpreted as alleging claims under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). A Bivens suit may not be brought against a private corporation like GEO Group 2 or its employees if the conduct is the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Correctional Services Corp. v. MaleskoSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Geiger v. JowersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Minneci v. PollardSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Gibson v. TolbertTexas Supreme Court · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Moghtader v. GEO Group, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2020