Legal Opinion

Schneider v. Payne

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

It is the contention of the appellants that under sec. 237.01 of the Wisconsin Statutes the parties take per stirpes as follows: the five parties plaintiff dividing the one-third share of the parent whom they represent; the defendant Addie E. Smith, the one-third share of the parent she represents; the defendants Jessie L. Burke and Grace L. Payne, the one-third share of the parent they represent.

Sub. (3) and (4) of sec. 237.01 of the Statutes of 1929 read as follows:

“(3) If he shall leave no lawful issue nor widow nor father nor mother his estate shall descend in equal shares to his brothers…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of NigroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Perkins v. SimondsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Van Cleve v. Van FossenMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Benson v. BensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  5. Douglas v. CameronNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Reil's EstateIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Febock v. Jefferson CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Bones v. LOLLISOregon Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API