Legal Opinion

Febock v. Jefferson County

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

Defendant demurred to the complaint on the grounds, (1) that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; and (2) that there is a defect of parties defendant, in that the persons in the mob who committed the unlawful acts were not joined by plaintiff as parties defendant. The allegations in the complaint which. are involved in considering defendant’s demurrer are as follows:

“That on the 16th day of January, 1933, the plaintiff, pursuant to public notice, endeavored to hold a public sale of chattel mortgaged property at his farm in said town of Lake Mills but was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hardenbergh v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Yalenezian v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  3. Butte Miners' Union v. City of ButteMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  4. E. L. Husting Co. v. Coca-Cola Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Town of Humboldt v. SchoenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sambs v. City of BrookfieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Diamond National Corporation v. Dale Lee, Trustee in BankruptcyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  3. A & B AUTO STORES v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  4. Agudo v. County of MontereyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Northern Assurance Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API