Legal Opinion
Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of California v. Berryhill
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 15, 1934No. 2972PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HIGGINS, Justice.
On January 24,1922, appellant issued to ap-pellee a policy of insurance. The terms of the contract pertinent to a consideration of questions here presented read:
“Should the insured, before attaining the age of sixty years and while this Policy is in full force and no premium thereon in default, become so disabled as to be totally and permanently unable to perform any work, or engage in any occupation or profession for wages, compensation or profit, or suffer the irrecoverable loss of the entire sight of both eyes, or the use of both hands or feet or of one hand and one foot,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'n v. MettlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Missouri State Life Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Funkhouser v. J. B. Preston Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- People of Sioux County v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Union Central Life Insurance v. ChowningTexas Supreme Court · 1894
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- First National Life Insurance Co. v. HerringCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- First National Life Insurance Company v. VititowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Boomer v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Boomer v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.