Legal Opinion
In Re Wiring Device Antitrust Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided February 17, 1978No. 331PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
Before JOHN MINOR WISDOM * , Chairman, and EDWARD WEINFELD*, EDWIN A. ROBSON*, JOSEPH S. LORD, III, STANLEY A. WEIGEL, ANDREW A. CAFFREY, and ROY W. HARPER, Judges of the Panel. PER CURIAM.
This litigation was spawned by the indictment of seven manufacturers, a corporation that manages trade associations, and eleven of their present and former officers for conspiracy to fix prices of electrical wiring devices, 1 in violation of the federal antitrust laws. A companion civil action brought by the Government names the eight indicted corporations and one indicted individual as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Plumbing Fixture CasesUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1968
- In Re Corrugated Container Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977
- In Re Anthracite Coal Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977
- In Re Hawaiian Hotel Room Rate Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977
- In Re South Central States Bakery Products Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Wiring Device Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1980
- Robinette Hardware Co. v. Square D Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1980
- In re California Armored Car Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1979
- In Re Cutter Laboratories, Inc., Etc.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1979