Legal Opinion
In Re South Central States Bakery Products Antitrust Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided July 11, 1977No. 282PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
2Per curiam
This litigation consists of six actions pending in three federal districts: three in the Eastern District of Texas (Missildine I, Missildine II and Johnson); two in the Western District of Louisiana (Hinten and Riddle); and one in the Middle District of Louisiana (Miller's). All six actions are private treble damage antitrust actions brought on behalf of various classes of bakery products purchasers.
These actions stem from four indictments returned on February 28, 1975, by a grand jury in the Middle District of Louisiana. Each indictment charged various producers of bakery…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Equity Funding Corp. of America Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1974
- In Re Griseofulvin Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1975
- In Re Sugar Industry Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1975
4Cited by7 opinions
- Missildine v. Ideal Baking Co.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1980
- In Re Hawaiian Hotel Room Rate Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977
- In Re Uranium Industry Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978
- In Re South Central States Bakery, Etc.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978
- In Re Motion Picture Licensing Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.