In Re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
2Per curiam
This litigation presently consists of 37 actions pending in seven federal districts: seventeen in the Southern District of Texas; fourteen in the Northern District of Illinois; two in the Southern District of New York; and one each in the Northern District of Texas, the Northern District of California, the Central District of California and the District of Minnesota.
The complaints in these actions basically allege that from as early as 1960 until 1975 the defendants and various co-conspirators have engaged in a nationwide conspiracy to fix, raise, maintain and stabilize the…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Investors Funding Corp. of New York Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977
- In Re Westinghouse Electric Corp. Uranium Contracts LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1975
- In Re Anthracite Coal Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977
- In Re Hawaiian Hotel Room Rate Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977
- In Re Sugar Industry Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation. Steering CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- In re Glassine & Greaseproof Paper Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- In Re Fine Paper Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978
- In Re Gas Meter Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1979
- In Re Corrugated Container Antitrust Lit.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.