Legal Opinion

Bennett v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 13, 1978No. [No. 3, September Term, 1978.]PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrth, J.

We hold that in a criminal prosecution by the State of Maryland the constitutional rights to due process of law 1 are not violated by placing upon the defendant the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence his assertion that a witness offered against him is an accomplice. 2

I

Foster Elwood Bennett was convicted in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County of robbery with a deadly weapon and the use of a handgun in the commission of a felony. He was sentenced to concurrent terms of imprisonment of eight years and five years, respectively, to begin at the expiration of a sentence he was…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Leland v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Anthony W.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. Rivenbark v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  3. Burroughs v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  4. Turner v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. Higgins v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API